Optimalisasi Pemanfaatan Artificial Intelligence dalam Peningkatan Kapasitas Penulisan Artikel Ilmiah Berbasis Etika Akademik
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61231/w24b1508Keywords:
Education, Educational Technology, AI literacy, Literacy Development, Student Achievement, SDG 4Abstract
The use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) not only enhances the efficiency of scientific writing but also contributes to the achievement of Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 4: Quality Education by strengthening digital literacy, promoting adaptive learning, and fostering twenty-first-century competencies. Various GenAI platforms can be utilized to generate research ideas, develop manuscript outlines, improve language quality, and manage citations and references more efficiently. However, the adoption of GenAI also presents challenges related to information validity, academic integrity, and users' ability to critically evaluate AI-generated outputs. This community service program aims to enhance the competencies of academics and students in using GenAI effectively, ethically, and responsibly to support scientific article writing. The results indicate that participants' understanding of the effective, critical, and responsible use of GenAI in scientific writing improved following the training. This program is expected to serve as a mentoring model for improving the quality of scientific publications, strengthening AI literacy, and supporting the transformation of learning in higher education in the era of artificial intelligence.
References
Batabyal, A. A., Kourtit, K., & Nijkamp, P. (2025). Artificial intelligence based technologies and economic growth in a creative region. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 34(5), 782–796. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2024.2374273
Bauer, N., Fütterer, T., Brucker, B., & Gerjets, P. (2026). Leveraging ChatGPT in academic writing: ChatGPT enhances students’ writing quality, writing experience, and ownership. Computers and Education Open, 10, 100351. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2026.100351
Chen, Z., Zhu, J., McGrane, J., Hopfenbeck, T. N., Wang, Y., & Ji, Y. (2026). More inspiration and attention: How Generative AI tools impact graduate students’ affective engagement in L2 source-based academic writing. Computers & Education, 242, 105495. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105495
Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2024). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(2), 228–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148
Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., Baabdullah, A. M., Koohang, A., Raghavan, V., Ahuja, M., Albanna, H., Albashrawi, M. A., Al-Busaidi, A. S., Balakrishnan, J., Barlette, Y., Basu, S., Bose, I., Brooks, L., Buhalis, D., … Wright, R. (2023). Opinion Paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642
Hong, S., & Shin, Y. K. (2025). Effects of three levels of AI integration on second language academic writing: Evaluating restricted, guided, and free use of ChatGPT. System, 134, 103820. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2025.103820
Jia, C., & Lu, Y. (2026). Exploring generative AI assisted-EFL academic writing: An activity theory perspective. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 81, 101672. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2026.101672
Kailin, Z., & Saeed, M. A. (2026). Chinese EFL learners’ engagement with ChatGPT feedback on academic writing: A case study in Malaysia. Computers and Composition, 79, 102976. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2025.102976
Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., … Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
Madsen, D. Ø., & Silva, E. S. (2026). Teaching citation in the age of generative AI: Rethinking research literacy, academic integrity, and epistemic responsibility. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 52(4), 103267. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2026.103267
Moorhouse, B. L., Wan, Y., Wu, C., Wu, M., & Ho, T. Y. (2025). Generative AI tools and empowerment in L2 academic writing. System, 133, 103779. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2025.103779
Nahiyan, S., & Rahman, A. G. (2026). Academic integrity and generative AI: Disciplinary teachers’ perspectives on ethical dilemmas in assessing writing in EMI universities. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 13, 102729. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2026.102729
Ormanci, U. (2026). Artificial intelligence in early childhood education: a systematic review of trends, methods, and recommendations for quality education. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2026.2651904
Torrents, D., Mancho, N., Mateos, J. L., & Prades, A. (2026). The role of artificial intelligence in higher education quality assessment: opportunities and limitations in predicting the quality risk in degree programmes. Quality in Higher Education, 32(1), 41–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2026.2642507
OECD (2026), OECD Digital Education Outlook 2026: Exploring Effective Uses of Generative AI in Education, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/062a7394-en.
UNESCO. (2024). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. UNESCO. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.54675/EWZM9535
Wang, C., Wang, B., & Xu, D. (2025). The role of ChatGPT and grammarly in promoting emotion regulation, psychological well-being, motivation, and academic writing in Chinese college students: A self-determination theory perspective. Learning and Motivation, 90, 102131. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2025.102131
Wu, C., Moorhouse, B. L., Wan, Y., & Wu, M. (2026). Exploring PhD students’ utilization of generative AI in academic writing for publication purposes: Insights for EAP. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 79, 101612. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2025.101612
Zhu, J., & Kong, S. C. (2026). Enhancing AI literacy course satisfaction through empowerment in AI problem-solving and ethical awareness: Development and validation of an AI project-based learning scale. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 11, 100624. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2026.100624
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Sumiati Sumiati, Nuraini Desty Nurmasari
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
