Workshop Literasi AI untuk Pembuatan Bahan Ajar Digital bagi Guru SD hingga SMA/SMK
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61231/evcn1241Keywords:
Literasi AI, Bahan Ajar Digital, Pelatihan Guru, Generative AI, Workshop PendidikanAbstract
Digital literacy among educators in Indonesia, particularly regarding the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) as an instructional tool, remains a critical challenge. This community service program aimed to improve AI literacy and practical skills in creating AI-based digital teaching materials among educators across educational levels, from elementary to senior high school (SD to SMA/SMK). The program was implemented through a series of workshops covering the use of Generative AI, Augmented Reality (AR), and Virtual Reality (VR) in learning design, conducted in Yogyakarta. Participants included 161 educators: 49 junior teachers (experience < 5 years) and 112 senior teachers (experience > 5 years). Data were collected through observation and documented through thematic analysis. Results showed that 100% of junior teachers and 72.32% of senior teachers (81 out of 112) had been exposed to generative AI tools prior to the workshop. Post-workshop evaluations indicated increased understanding of AI tools and improved ability to design AI-integrated teaching materials. Key barriers to AI adoption identified include limited digital infrastructure, low self-efficacy, and absence of structured AI training programs. The primary output of this program is a set of AI-based digital teaching materials produced by participants during the workshop. These findings contribute practical recommendations for designing scalable AI literacy training programs for educators in Indonesia.
References
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Chai, C. S., Lin, P. Y., Jong, M. S. Y., Dai, Y., Chiu, T. K. F., & Qin, J. (2021). Perceptions of and behavioral intentions towards learning artificial intelligence in primary school students. Educational Technology & Society, 24(3), 89-101.
Crompton, H., Burke, D., & Gregory, K. H. (2017). The use of mobile learning in PK-12 education: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 110, 51-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.03.013
Crompton, H., Burke, D., & Jordan, K. (2022). Artificial intelligence in K-12 education: A systematic review in the literature. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 27(2), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-022-09602-4
Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first- and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 47-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299597
Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255-284. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2010.10782551
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2023). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.
Kemendikbudristek. (2023). Kerangka Kurikulum Merdeka: Integrasi teknologi dan kecerdasan buatan dalam pembelajaran. Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia.
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall.
Kominfo. (2022). Indeks literasi digital Indonesia 2022. Kementerian Komunikasi dan Informatika Republik Indonesia.
Mezirow, J. (1997). Transformative learning: Theory to practice. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 1997(74), 5-12. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.7401
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
Pedaste, M., Maeots, M., Leijen, A., & Sarapuu, T. (2012). Improving students’ inquiry skills through reflection and self-regulation scaffolds. Technology, Instruction, Cognition and Learning, 9(1-2), 81-95.
Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Teo, T. (2018). Becoming more specific: Measuring and modeling teachers’ perceived usefulness of ICT in the context of teaching and learning. Computers & Education, 120, 103-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.01.021
Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2017). Understanding the relationship between teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and technology use in education: A systematic review of qualitative evidence. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(3), 555-575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9481-2
Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Pareja Roblin, N., Tondeur, J., & van Braak, J. (2013). Technological pedagogical content knowledge - a review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(2), 109-121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2012.00487.x
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education - where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Muhammad Fauzan Gustafi, Amalina Nur Arifah, Muhammad Haedar Zhafran Hidayatulloh
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
